← Search

Tina Binette

— year-end
126 matches · 82W–44L · seasons 2020–2027

Captains: add Tina Binette to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history126 matches
L
2026-07-07 · Chadds Walk (Lisa Ray)* · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Sarah Grasso
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 0-6
L
2026-06-30 · Chadds Walk (Lisa Ray)* · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Kathrine Kinsey
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 3-6
L
2026-06-19 · Saddle Creek (Ann Long)* · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Erin Frink
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
W
2026-04-24 · #2 Doubles · with Rishi Krishnamurthy - (DQ) championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-1
W
2026-04-17 · Sandy Springs RC (Jason Reichel)* · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Robert Council mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 6-2
L
2026-04-11 · Harrison (Ashley Taylor)* · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sheri de Haan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 5-7
L
2026-03-28 · Harrison (Ashley Taylor)* · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Erin Frink
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
W
2026-03-19 · Sandy Springs RC (Jason Reichel)* · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Joseph Olender mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-03-14 · Harrison (Ashley Taylor)* · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ashley Taylor
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 7-5, 1-0
W
2026-03-13 · Sandy Springs RC (Jason Reichel)* · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Rishi Krishnamurthy mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-2
L
2026-01-16 · Foxworth (Kristin Funt)* · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kristin Funt
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 2-6, 3-6
L
2026-01-08 · Foxworth (Kristin Funt)* · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 4-6
Teams26 teams · 2023–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.5
71.7%
38W–15L · 56.2% of games
4.0
46.3%
19W–22L · 50.7% of games
4.5
0%
0W–4L · 22.6% of games
7.5
100%
5W–0L · 62.9% of games
3.5mixed
85.7%
12W–2L · 61.6% of games
4.0mixed
87.5%
7W–1L · 64.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 39% of the time
#1 Doubles
39%
49 matches
#3 Doubles
24%
30 matches
#2 Doubles
18%
23 matches
#1 Singles
12%
15 matches
#2 Singles
4%
5 matches
#4 Doubles
3%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to take the initiative and play your game. Confidence is just believing you can do it.
Chris Evert