← Search

Shelby Schaffner

— year-end
191 matches · 74W–117L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Shelby Schaffner to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history191 matches
L
2026-07-20 · A18 4.0W TP Speller-Bontempo · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jamie Hilborn
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 4-6, 0-1
L
2026-07-19 · X18 8.0 TP Schaffner · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Brendan Ho mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 2-6
W
2026-06-22 · A18 4.0W TP Speller-Bontempo · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Erin Gray
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-4
L
2026-06-21 · X18 8.0 TP Schaffner · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Stephen DeBacco mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 3-6
L
2026-06-15 · A18 4.0W TP Speller-Bontempo · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jamie Hilborn
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 1-6
L
2026-06-08 · A18 4.0W TP Speller-Bontempo · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kristianne Bontempo
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 2-6
W
2026-06-01 · A18 4.0W TP Speller-Bontempo · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jamie Hilborn
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-0
L
2026-05-31 · X18 8.0 TP Schaffner · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Edward Raffel mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 7-6, 0-1
L
Andrea Brown / Michelle Simmons
2026-05-18 · A18 4.0W TP Speller-Bontempo · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Hannah Lindesmith
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
W
2026-05-17 · X18 8.0 TP Schaffner · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Brendan Ho mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 6-7, 1-0
W
2026-05-11 · A18 4.0W TP Speller-Bontempo · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jamie Hilborn
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
W
2026-04-24 · A18 4.0W TP Gray · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jamie Fox
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 7-5, 1-0
Teams40 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
4.0
45.7%
32W–38L · 50.9% of games
6.5
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
7.5
31.1%
19W–42L · 42% of games
5.0mixed
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
36.4%
8W–14L · 47.1% of games
7.5mixed
28.6%
2W–5L · 39.2% of games
8.0mixed
38.5%
10W–16L · 42.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 49% of the time
#1 Doubles
49%
93 matches
#2 Doubles
40%
76 matches
#3 Doubles
12%
22 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams