← Search

Edward Raffel

Akron, OH
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
104 matches · 36W–68L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Edward Raffel to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history104 matches
L
2026-07-19 · X18 8.0 TP Schaffner · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Cora Shane mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 3-6
W
2026-07-18 · A65 7.0M NC Christman · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Scott Martin
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-0
L
2026-07-16 · A18 4.0M 2 TP Leffler · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Matthew Debiec
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
L
2026-07-02 · A18 4.0M 2 TP Leffler · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Andrew Leffler
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-06-26 · A18 4.0M 2 TP Leffler · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Anthony Wnoroski
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
L
2026-06-18 · A18 4.0M 2 TP Leffler · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ben Vasunia
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 0-6
W
2026-06-13 · A65 7.0M NC Christman · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Timothy Feller
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-3
L
2026-06-07 · X18 8.0 TP Schaffner · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Jamie Hilborn mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 4-6
L
James Trapp / Jeffrey Miller
2026-06-06 · A65 7.0M NC Christman · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Timothy Feller
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 6-7
W
Jason Ganim / Vincent Gambaccini
2026-06-04 · A18 4.0M 2 TP Leffler · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Anthony Wnoroski
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-05-31 · X18 8.0 TP Schaffner · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Shelby Schaffner mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 7-6, 0-1
L
2026-05-21 · A18 4.0M 2 TP Leffler · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ben Vasunia
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 5-7
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams27 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
4.0
30.2%
16W–37L · 42.7% of games
7.0
52.9%
9W–8L · 53.1% of games
7.5
33.3%
4W–8L · 40.7% of games
7.0mixed
60%
3W–2L · 52.1% of games
7.5mixed
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
21.4%
3W–11L · 41.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 52% of the time
#1 Doubles
52%
54 matches
#2 Doubles
33%
34 matches
#3 Doubles
13%
13 matches
#1 Singles
2%
2 matches
#2 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova