← Search

Tiffany Zweifel

— year-end
161 matches · 75W–86L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Tiffany Zweifel to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history161 matches
L
2026-06-24 · Charity Kunz 4.5 18+ · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Kariesa Lamph
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 4-6
W
2026-06-24 · Charity Kunz 4.5 18+ · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Kim Bryan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-1
L
2026-06-08 · Charity Kunz 4.5 18+ · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Hayley Hill
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-3, 0-1
L
2026-06-01 · Charity Kunz 4.5 18+ · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Jenell Lester
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
L
2026-05-27 · Charity Kunz 4.5 18+ · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Charity Kunz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 5-7
W
2025-08-16 · #3 Doubles · with Brandi Cornelison championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-5
L
2025-08-15 · #3 Doubles · with Kariesa Lamph championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 2-6
W
2025-08-15 · #1 Doubles · with Angie Anderson championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 4-6, 1-0
W
2025-07-25 · Kunz 4.0 40+ · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kariesa Lamph
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-2
L
2025-07-24 · Bryan · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Mona Palmer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 2-6
L
2025-07-22 · Bryan · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Alicia Woodhouse
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-3, 0-1
W
2025-07-21 · Kunz 4.0 40+ · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kariesa Lamph
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-7, 1-0
Teams25 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
4.0
70.4%
38W–16L · 57.4% of games
4.5
9.4%
3W–29L · 34% of games
7.0mixed
50%
4W–4L · 53% of games
7.5mixed
75%
3W–1L · 54.1% of games
8.0mixed
38.2%
13W–21L · 45.1% of games
8.5mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
9.0mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 38% of the time
#1 Doubles
38%
61 matches
#2 Doubles
34%
55 matches
#3 Doubles
27%
44 matches
#1 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The mark of great sportsmen is not how good they are at their best, but how good they are at their worst.
Martina Navratilova