← Search

Lurline Berry

Pocatello, ID
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
189 matches · 88W–101L · seasons 2020–2026

Captains: add Lurline Berry to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history189 matches
W
2026-08-17 · Berry · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jacqualyn Nelson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
L
2026-08-05 · Lloyd · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jennifer Lloyd
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 0-2
W
2026-08-05 · Berry · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jacqualyn Nelson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 2-6, 1-0
W
2026-08-03 · Lloyd · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lynda Fennern
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-5
L
2026-08-02 · #1 Doubles · with Anita Gibson championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 5-7, 1-0
W
2026-08-01 · #1 Doubles · with Michele Surmelis championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 7-6, 1-0
W
2026-07-31 · #1 Doubles · with Anita Gibson championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-4
L
Jennifer Vargo / Lana Penrose
2026-07-31 · #1 Doubles · with Carrie Rose Lindley championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
L
2026-07-30 · Berry · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lynda Fennern
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 0-6, 0-1
L
2026-07-29 · Lloyd · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jennifer Lloyd
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-7
L
2026-07-28 · Net Assets · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Brittany Grigg
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 4-6, 0-1
L
2026-07-27 · Lloyd · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Adrianne Shirley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-3, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams41 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level9 levels played
3.0
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
4.0
40.8%
29W–42L · 44.9% of games
4.5
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
7.0
83.3%
20W–4L · 63.1% of games
8.0
23.1%
3W–10L · 40.6% of games
0.0mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
17.4%
4W–19L · 37.8% of games
7.5mixed
54.5%
6W–5L · 51.3% of games
8.0mixed
66.7%
6W–3L · 54.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 49% of the time
#1 Doubles
49%
92 matches
#2 Doubles
29%
54 matches
#3 Doubles
22%
42 matches
#1 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert