← Search

Traci Schimpf

— year-end
91 matches · 55W–36L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Traci Schimpf to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history91 matches
L
2026-07-20 · A18 4.0W LT Kim · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Selena Kim
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 3-6, 0-1
W
2026-07-13 · A18 4.0W LT Kim · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Elizabeth van Dyke
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
L
2026-07-08 · A40 4.0W LT Kim · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Alicia Blessing
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 1-6
L
2026-07-01 · A40 4.0W LT Kim · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Laura Engles
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 6-7
W
2026-06-20 · A40 4.0W LT Kim · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Shelley Frew
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-1
L
2026-05-11 · A18 4.0W LT Kim · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kari Gillen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
2026-04-12 · NEO/Banas/X40&Over8.0 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Jeffrey Tong mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-03-29 · Mid Tri W LT Kim · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Elizabeth van Dyke
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-1
W
2026-03-22 · NEO/Banas/X40&Over8.0 · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Jeffrey Tong mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-03-15 · Mid Tri W LT Kim · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Julie Samora
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-0, 0-1
L
2026-02-26 · A55 8.0W MV Chuko · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Kristin Ubersax
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
W
2026-02-22 · NEO/Banas/X40&Over8.0 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Jeffrey Tong mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 6-3, 1-0
Teams32 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
3.0
50%
2W–2L · 60.3% of games
4.0
73.8%
31W–11L · 60.1% of games
4.5
36.4%
4W–7L · 44.4% of games
7.5
75%
6W–2L · 53.8% of games
8.0
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
8.5
50%
7W–7L · 47.8% of games
8.0mixed
71.4%
5W–2L · 56.8% of games
9.0mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 44% of the time
#2 Doubles
44%
40 matches
#1 Doubles
32%
29 matches
#3 Doubles
20%
18 matches
#4 Doubles
3%
3 matches
#1 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.
Roger Federer