← Search

Elizabeth van Dyke

Hudson, OH
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
46 matches · 25W–21L · seasons 2024–2026

Captains: add Elizabeth van Dyke to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history46 matches
W
2026-07-19 · X18 8.0 LT Simon · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Ian Kidd mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-1
W
2026-07-13 · A18 4.0W LT Kim · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Traci Schimpf
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
L
Paige Meyers / Nicole Gregory
2026-07-07 · A18 4.5W MV Schron · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Carolann Sterkenburg
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
W
2026-07-06 · A18 4.0W LT Kim · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Laura Engles
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
W
2026-06-15 · A18 4.0W LT Kim · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Karyn Costin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
W
2026-06-14 · X18 8.0 LT Simon · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Murphy Dickason mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-4
W
2026-06-01 · A18 4.0W LT Kim · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Laura Engles
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
W
2026-05-31 · X18 8.0 LT Simon · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Stephen Radachi mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 4-6, 1-0
L
Lisa Boucher / Karlie Nicolae
2026-05-26 · A18 4.5W MV Schron · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Michelle Miluk
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 4-6
L
2026-05-18 · A18 4.0W LT Kim · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Caterina Petty
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
W
2026-04-11 · A18 4.5+W LT Wagers · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Selena Kim
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-03-29 · Mid Tri W LT Kim · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Traci Schimpf
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 6-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams18 teams · 2024–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
3.0
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
3.5
66.7%
6W–3L · 58.2% of games
4.0
75%
9W–3L · 57% of games
4.5
14.3%
1W–6L · 43.2% of games
6.5
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.5
60%
3W–2L · 56.8% of games
8.0mixed
50%
4W–4L · 51.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 46% of the time
#1 Doubles
46%
21 matches
#2 Doubles
41%
19 matches
#3 Doubles
13%
6 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Losing is not my enemy. Fear of losing is my enemy.
Rafael Nadal