← Search

Jane Timken

Canton, OH
2.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
58 matches · 18W–40L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Jane Timken to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history58 matches
W
Kellie Hill / Marie Fletcher
2026-07-14 · A18 2.5W BR Fulmer · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Lindsay Zimmerman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 2-6, 1-0
L
2026-07-07 · A18 2.5W BR Fulmer · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Joey Obyrne
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 1-6
W
Rachel Doria / Elisabetta Valmachino
2026-06-30 · A18 2.5W BR Fulmer · #1 Doubles · 2.5 · with Lindsay Zimmerman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
W
Megan Nall / Karley Salibi
2026-06-23 · A18 2.5W BR Fulmer · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Evrim Fulmer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
2026-04-24 · Entry Tri W BR Timken · #3 Doubles · 2.5 · with Dena Morrison
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 6-4
L
2026-02-21 · A18 3.0W BR Morrison · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kari Schauer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 2-6
L
2026-02-06 · Entry Tri W BR Timken · #3 Doubles · 2.5 · with Allison Pedrozo
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 4-6
L
2025-11-02 · C 5.5W NC1 Dowd · #3 Doubles · 5.5 · with Melissa Thomas
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 2-6
L
2025-10-05 · C 5.5W NC1 Dowd · #2 Doubles · 5.5 · with Elizabeth Milavickas
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 4-6
L
2025-07-10 · A18 2.5W BR Timken · #1 Doubles · 2.5 · with Kari Schauer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
W
Holly Miller / Ellie Opperman
2025-07-02 · A18 2.5W BR Timken · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Michelle Patterson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
L
Kelly Smith / Mary Lewis
2025-05-21 · A18 2.5W BR Timken · #1 Doubles · 2.5 · with Elizabeth Milavickas
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams21 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
2.5
35%
7W–13L · 43.9% of games
3.0
0%
0W–10L · 34.3% of games
5.5
39.3%
11W–17L · 45.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 38% of the time
#1 Doubles
38%
22 matches
#2 Doubles
35%
20 matches
#3 Doubles
14%
8 matches
#1 Singles
9%
5 matches
#4 Doubles
5%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams