← Search

Jana Schweikert

North Canton, OH
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
186 matches · 89W–97L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Jana Schweikert to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history186 matches
L
2026-07-16 · A55 6.0W GR Denissoff · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Laura Simon
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 0-6, 0-1
W
2026-07-15 · A18 3.0W GR MacLane Hodges · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Heidi MacLane-Hodges
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
L
2026-07-12 · X18 6.0 GR Bortz · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with John Ragner mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 4-6
W
2026-07-11 · A40 3.0W GR Neely · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kara Wedekamm
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-07-06 · A40 3.0W GR Neely · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kara Wedekamm
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-07-01 · A18 3.0W GR MacLane Hodges · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Michelle Mlachak
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
2026-06-28 · X18 6.0 GR Bortz · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Matthew Taylor mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 6-2
L
2026-06-24 · A18 3.0W GR MacLane Hodges · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Lisa Bortz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
W
2026-06-18 · A55 6.0W GR Denissoff · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Laura Simon
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-06-14 · X18 6.0 GR Bortz · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Matthew Taylor mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 6-7
L
2026-06-11 · A55 6.0W GR Denissoff · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Barbara Plum
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 7-6, 1-0
L
2026-06-04 · A55 6.0W GR Denissoff · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Cathy Williams
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams34 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.0
47.1%
40W–45L · 51% of games
3.5
20%
4W–16L · 39.4% of games
5.5
43.3%
13W–17L · 50.7% of games
6.0
76.9%
10W–3L · 62.9% of games
6.5
58.8%
20W–14L · 53.8% of games
6.0mixed
50%
2W–2L · 49.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 52% of the time
#1 Doubles
52%
96 matches
#2 Doubles
28%
53 matches
#3 Doubles
18%
33 matches
#4 Doubles
2%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.
Roger Federer