← Search

Michelle Kleppel

— year-end
80 matches · 41W–39L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Michelle Kleppel to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history80 matches
W
Megan Kline / Lauren Wiggam
2026-07-15 · A18 3.0W SP Pulk · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kelly McVay
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-1
L
Amy Damrow / Kimberly Williams
2026-07-09 · A18 3.5W PM Leohr · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Michaelia Cucci
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 0-6
W
2026-07-01 · A18 3.0W SP Pulk · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Julie Pulk
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 5-7, 1-0
L
2026-06-17 · A18 3.0W SP Pulk · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Gaby Cases
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
W
2026-06-08 · A40 3.0W PM1 Sloan · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kristi Scherler
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-06-04 · A18 3.5W PM Leohr · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jill Lengel
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
W
2026-05-27 · A18 3.0W SP Pulk · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Julie Pulk
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
L
2026-05-03 · A18 3.5W PM1 Leohr · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jill Lengel
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 6-3, 0-1
L
2026-04-26 · A18 3.5W PM1 Leohr · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Marcela Nicolae
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 1-6
W
2026-04-25 · A18 3.0W PM2 Perkins · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Ann Lynch
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
W
2026-04-04 · A18 3.0W PM2 Perkins · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Anne Fortney
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-03-29 · X40 6.0 PM2 Tople · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Tavi Muresan mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 2-6, 1-0
Teams24 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.0
77.8%
7W–2L · 54.2% of games
3.5
40.8%
20W–29L · 48.2% of games
6.5
60%
12W–8L · 57.3% of games
6.0mixed
2W–0L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 35% of the time
#3 Doubles
35%
28 matches
#2 Doubles
34%
27 matches
#1 Doubles
28%
22 matches
#4 Doubles
4%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The mark of great sportsmen is not how good they are at their best, but how good they are at their worst.
Martina Navratilova