← Search

Judith Jobrack

Fredericksburg, VA
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
162 matches · 72W–90L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Judith Jobrack to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history162 matches
L
Maggie Cossman / Amy Kowalski
2026-07-18 · #2 Doubles · with Tara Ford championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-07-17 · #2 Doubles · with Tara Ford championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
Kari Bivins / Michelle Lilly
2026-07-17 · #3 Doubles · with Tara Ford championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 5-7
L
2026-06-19 · #1 Doubles · with Jason Gordon championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
L
2026-06-19 · #1 Doubles · with Jason Gordon championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 2-6
W
Brandy Jones / Sheila Schultz
2026-06-11 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Tara Ford
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
L
Leigha Wood / Jamie Mcneill
2026-05-26 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Sabra Szczyglowski
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
W
2026-05-09 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Tara Ford
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
W
2026-04-11 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Tara Ford
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
2026-03-15 · Caliri · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kim Gudyka
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-2
W
N/A
2026-03-08 · Caliri · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kim Gudyka
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-03-07 · Nankivel - TNT 7.0 Mixed · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jason Gordon mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-3
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams30 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
3.0
60%
12W–8L · 56.3% of games
3.5
21.4%
9W–33L · 38.1% of games
6.5
71.4%
5W–2L · 56.5% of games
7.0
52.4%
11W–10L · 52.5% of games
3.0mixed
85.7%
6W–1L · 72.2% of games
6.5mixed
57.1%
4W–3L · 52% of games
7.0mixed
51.6%
16W–15L · 52.4% of games
7.5mixed
2W–0L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 36% of the time
#3 Doubles
36%
58 matches
#2 Doubles
33%
54 matches
#1 Doubles
30%
49 matches
#2 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to take the initiative and play your game. Confidence is just believing you can do it.
Chris Evert