← Search

Jane Sances

North Andover, MA
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
77 matches · 45W–32L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Jane Sances to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history77 matches
L
2026-07-02 · SFT:Spark-A Blue:Sideman · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tracy Salvi
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
W
2026-05-19 · SFT:Spark-A:Blue:Sideman · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kelly O'Connor
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-4
W
2026-05-14 · SFT:Spark-A Blue:Sideman · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Brenda Shield
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
W
2025-07-17 · SFT:Spark Green:Barry · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Victoria Dowling
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-0
L
2025-07-15 · SFT:Spark Green:Barry · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Beth Humberd
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 2-6, 1-0
W
2025-07-10 · SFT:Spark Green:Barry · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Mary D'Aoust
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-2
L
2025-07-02 · SFT:Spark Green:Barry · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Chelsie Foster
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-7
W
2025-06-24 · SFT:Spark Green:Barry · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Robyn Renahan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-0
W
2025-06-19 · SFT:Spark Green:Barry · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Chelsie Foster
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-0
L
2025-06-05 · SFT:Spark Green:Barry · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Bridget MacMillan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-2, 0-1
W
2023-07-24 · SFT:Spark F&T:Sances · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Cheryl Sullivan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-0
W
2023-07-20 · SFT:Spark F&T Green:Barry · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 5-2
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams20 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.5
65.2%
30W–16L · 57.7% of games
7.0
81.8%
9W–2L · 63.9% of games
6.0mixed
62.5%
5W–3L · 49.3% of games
7.0mixed
8.3%
1W–11L · 40.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 31% of the time
#3 Doubles
31%
24 matches
#2 Doubles
26%
20 matches
#1 Doubles
23%
18 matches
#1 Singles
12%
9 matches
#2 Singles
8%
6 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert