Heather Mixon
Chicago, IL
80 matches · 61W–19L · seasons 2024–2026
Captains: add Heather Mixon to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.
Match history80 matches
W
Samantha Kohn / Stephanie Plautz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
Olivia Denton / Katherine Long
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-3
L
Emily Buerschen / Safiyya Strausbaugh
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 1-6, 1-0
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-1
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-0
L
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
W
Keeley van Antwerp
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
L
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 5-7, 0-1
L
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 2-4
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams27 teams · 2023–2027
CHI E 18W4.5 3.STP Nakamura Sat 3 $22
CHI E M18.9.0 2.Wilm Nakamura Sun 11 $20
CDTA E 18&OW4.5 2STP Wright Sat 3 $22
CDTA E M18&O9.0 1Cent Nakamura Sun 1 $20
CDTA S 18&OW4.5 5.STP Wright Sat 3 $22
CDTA S TriWHi 2.Tam Wright Sun 5 $22
CDTA S TriWMid 6.STP Wright Sat 3 $22
CDTA W 18&OW4.5 2.STP Wright Sat 3 $22
CDTA W M18&O9.0 4.Wlmt Nakamura Sun 11 $20
CDTA W TriWHi 2.STP Wright Sat 3 $22
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.5
50%
7W–7L · 54.7% of games
4.0
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
4.5
92.3%
24W–2L · 65.3% of games
8.5
100%
4W–0L · 53.6% of games
9.0mixed
81.8%
9W–2L · 56.2% of games
Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.
By lineusually #1 Doubles, 50% of the time
#1 Doubles
50%
40 matches
#2 Doubles
39%
31 matches
#1 Singles
6%
5 matches
#2 Singles
4%
3 matches
#3 Doubles
1%
1 match
How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.
Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.
The mark of great sportsmen is not how good they are at their best, but how good they are at their worst.