Emily Doyle
Park Ridge, IL
222 matches · 149W–73L · seasons 2021–2026
Captains: add Emily Doyle to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.
Match history222 matches
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-2
L
Kim Richards / Cathy Bloedorn
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 4-6, 0-1
L
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-4
L
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-4, 0-1
W
N/A
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
L
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-4, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams70 teams · 2021–2027
CHI E 18W4.5 5.Wilm Miller Fri 7 $20
CHI E 40W4.5 1.Tam Jurczyk Sat 1 $25
CDTA E 18&OW4.5 2STP Wright Sat 3 $22
CDTA E 40&OW4.5 3Tam Jurczyk Sat 1 $22
CDTA E M18&O9.0 4RT Stenmark Fri 7:30 $27
CDTA E M40&O8.0 1RT Lam1 Sat 2 $27
CDTA S 18&OW4.5 5.STP Wright Sat 3 $22
CDTA S 40&OW4.5 3.Tam Jurczyk Wed 7 $22
CDTA S ComboW8.5 3.RCLB Cal Wed 7 $22
CDTA S ComboX7.5 5.RT Spinazze Sat 7 $27
CDTA S M18&O8.0 2.CPE Sitar Fri 7 $28
CDTA S M40&O8.0 2.RT Lam-1 Sun 4 $27
CDTA S TriWMid 8.Gnvw Baltazar Tue 7 $21
CDTA W 18&OW4.5 2.STP Wright Sat 3 $22
CDTA W 40&OW4.5 3.Tam Jurczyk Sat 1 $22
CDTA W ComboW8.5 3.RCLB Cal Sat 4 $22
CDTA W M18&O9.0 5.RT Stenmark Fri 7 $27
CDTA W M40&O8.0 1.RT Lam-1 Sat 7 $27
CDTA W TriWHi 3.RT Chala Fri 7 $27
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level10 levels played
3.0
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
3.5
58.3%
14W–10L · 53.7% of games
4.0
77.1%
54W–16L · 64.8% of games
4.5
82.1%
23W–5L · 59.2% of games
7.5
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
8.5
61.5%
8W–5L · 52.6% of games
7.5mixed
42.9%
3W–4L · 44.9% of games
8.0mixed
76.7%
23W–7L · 57.8% of games
8.5mixed
53.3%
8W–7L · 51.6% of games
9.0mixed
16.7%
2W–10L · 47.1% of games
Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.
By lineusually #1 Doubles, 39% of the time
#1 Doubles
39%
87 matches
#2 Doubles
22%
48 matches
#3 Doubles
19%
41 matches
#1 Singles
18%
40 matches
#4 Doubles
2%
5 matches
#2 Singles
1%
1 match
How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.
Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.
The mark of great sportsmen is not how good they are at their best, but how good they are at their worst.