← Search

Laure Flaniken

— year-end
149 matches · 73W–76L · seasons 2019–2025

Captains: add Laure Flaniken to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history149 matches
L
2024-12-12 · CIN A40 4.0W TU IRCD Gibson · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Tina Myrick
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-3, 0-1
L
2024-12-10 · CIN A40 4.0W TU IRCD Gibson · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Tina Myrick
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-7
L
2024-12-03 · CIN A40 4.0W TU IRCD Gibson · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
W
2024-11-26 · CIN A40 4.0W TU IRCD Gibson · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Mary Beth Servie
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-1, 1-0
W
2024-11-23 · CIN A40 3.5W SA IRCD Flaniken · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sarah Honaker
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-0
L
Angela Davis / Cynthia Heinbaugh
2024-11-12 · CIN A40 4.0W TU IRCD Gibson · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sarah Honaker
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
W
2024-11-02 · CIN A40 3.5W SA IRCD Flaniken · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Stacy Davis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-0
L
2024-10-22 · CIN A40 4.0W TU IRCD Gibson · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
W
Kay Taylor
2024-10-10 · CIN A40 3.5W SA IRCD Flaniken · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
2024-09-28 · CIN A40 3.5W SA IRCD Flaniken · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
L
2024-08-01 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Mary Coyne
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-1, 0-1
L
2024-07-29 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kristen Combes
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
Teams4 teams · 2024–2025
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.5
55.1%
43W–35L · 55.9% of games
4.0
29%
9W–22L · 41.6% of games
7.0
77.8%
14W–4L · 59.4% of games
7.5
25%
2W–6L · 41.2% of games
7.0mixed
35.7%
5W–9L · 43.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 38% of the time
#1 Doubles
38%
57 matches
#2 Doubles
32%
47 matches
#1 Singles
20%
30 matches
#3 Doubles
9%
14 matches
#4 Doubles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova