← Search

Brian Heaphy

Cary, NC
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
84 matches · 45W–39L · seasons 2021–2026

Captains: add Brian Heaphy to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history84 matches
L
2026-09-06 · LOCH.Reynolds · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Scott Anderson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
L
2026-06-10 · LOCH.Baldwin · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Phil Medlin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 5-7, 0-1
L
2026-05-27 · LOCH.Baldwin · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with David Ferris
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
W
2026-05-17 · LOCH.Reynolds · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Scott Anderson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 1-6, 1-0
L
2026-05-14 · LOCH.Waters · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Dan Robinson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
L
2026-05-05 · LOCH.Reynolds · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jeff Estroff
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 4-6
L
2026-04-26 · LOCH.Reynolds · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Christopher Chaney
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
W
2026-04-19 · LOCH.Reynolds · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Everett Laborde
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
W
2026-04-18 · LOCH.Waters · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Charles Newsome
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
L
2026-04-12 · LOCH.Reynolds · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kyle Reynolds
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
W
2026-04-11 · LOCH.Waters · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Dan Robinson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 7-5
L
2026-03-31 · LOCH.Reynolds · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Mark Baldwin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 4-6, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams41 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.5
62.5%
10W–6L · 56.5% of games
4.0
34.5%
10W–19L · 43% of games
7.5
57.7%
15W–11L · 51.3% of games
8.5
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
100%
6W–0L · 64.5% of games
8.0mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 33% of the time
#2 Doubles
33%
28 matches
#3 Doubles
31%
26 matches
#1 Doubles
26%
22 matches
#4 Doubles
8%
7 matches
#3 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Success is a journey, not a destination. The doing is often more important than the outcome.
Arthur Ashe