← Search

Eric Schraibman

Holly Springs, NC
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
87 matches · 65W–22L · seasons 2021–2026

Captains: add Eric Schraibman to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history87 matches
W
2026-08-30 · LOCH.Reynolds · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Taylor VICK
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-08-16 · LOCH.Reynolds · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Ryan Goff
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-7, 1-0
W
2026-07-30 · CAS.Nealis · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Joseph Swoager
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-07-09 · CAS.Nealis · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jeffrey Tabelon
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
L
2026-07-02 · CAS.Nealis · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with John Nealis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
L
2026-06-25 · CAS.Nealis · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jeffrey Tabelon
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-3, 0-1
W
2026-06-04 · CAS.Nealis · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Alex Holder
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-7, 1-0
W
2026-05-03 · CAS.Nealis · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with John Nealis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
W
2026-04-26 · CAS.Nealis · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Luivi Valero
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
L
2026-04-06 · CAS.Nealis · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Frank Harrison
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
W
2026-03-29 · CAS.Nealis · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Frank Harrison
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-0
W
2026-03-22 · CAS.Nealis · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jeffrey Tabelon
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-4, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams17 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.5
80.6%
25W–6L · 66.2% of games
4.0
73.7%
14W–5L · 57.9% of games
6.5
33.3%
2W–4L · 39.2% of games
7.5
86.7%
13W–2L · 59.8% of games
8.0mixed
50%
2W–2L · 57.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 45% of the time
#1 Doubles
45%
39 matches
#2 Doubles
25%
22 matches
#3 Doubles
24%
21 matches
#4 Doubles
3%
3 matches
#2 Singles
1%
1 match
#3 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The mark of great sportsmen is not how good they are at their best, but how good they are at their worst.
Martina Navratilova