← Search

Christine Hines

Arlington, VA
3.0A year-end 2025
i
Appeal — granted on request, not computed
47 matches · 23W–24L · seasons 2024–2026

Captains: add Christine Hines to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history47 matches
W
2026-07-26 · Team 7 Love & Deuces 3.5 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Cheryl Arnold
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 4-3
L
2026-07-19 · Team 7 Love & Deuces 3.5 · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 1-6
L
2026-07-16 · Team 7 Love & Deuces 3.5 · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 0-5
W
2026-07-14 · Team 6 Love & Deuces 3.0 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Ingrid Hunsicker
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-07-07 · Team 6 Love & Deuces 3.0 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Elizabeth Poplawski
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
W
2026-06-29 · Team 7 Love & Deuces 3.5 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Meghan Ringelberg
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 3-3
W
2026-06-28 · Team 6 Love & Deuces 3.0 · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 5-2
L
2026-06-24 · Team 7 Love & Deuces 3.5 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Devika Eddula
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
W
2026-06-23 · Team 6 Love & Deuces 3.0 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Meghan Ringelberg
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-5
L
2026-06-17 · Team 6 Love & Deuces 3.0 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Mary de Dios
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 1-1
W
2026-06-14 · Team 1 Crenshaw · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Thomas Snedeker mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 6-1, 1-0
L
2026-06-09 · Team 6 Love & Deuces 3.0 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Amber Wooten
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 4-4
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams13 teams · 2024–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.0
68.4%
13W–6L · 62% of games
3.5
23.1%
3W–10L · 36.1% of games
6.5
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
62.5%
5W–3L · 52% of games
7.0mixed
25%
1W–3L · 38.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 28% of the time
#1 Doubles
28%
13 matches
#2 Doubles
28%
13 matches
#3 Doubles
21%
10 matches
#1 Singles
15%
7 matches
#2 Singles
9%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams