← Search

Jodi Seth

Mc Lean, VA
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
126 matches · 41W–85L · seasons 2020–2026

Captains: add Jodi Seth to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history126 matches
L
2026-08-30 · Pair Jordans · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Fri-Atsoh AchiriMofor
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 0-6
L
2026-07-26 · Pair Jordans · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Gail Taylor
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
L
2026-07-19 · Team 2 Slice and Dice · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lena Brandenburg
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
L
2026-07-18 · Pair Jordans · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jennifer Chavez
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
L
2026-07-08 · Team 2 Slice and Dice · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sharon Petri
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 0-6
L
2026-07-05 · Team 2 Slice and Dice · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lena Brandenburg
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
L
2026-06-29 · Team 2 Slice and Dice · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kristen Blackburn
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-3
W
N/A
2026-06-25 · Team 2 Slice and Dice · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Shiva Shahabadi
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-06-24 · Team 2 Slice and Dice · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Wendy Hubbert
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
W
2026-06-13 · Pair Jordans · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lena Brandenburg
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
L
2026-06-07 · Pair Jordans · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jane Chen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 3-5
L
2026-06-06 · Pair Jordans · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jane Chen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 0-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams29 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
2.5
39.3%
11W–17L · 46.2% of games
3.0
38.9%
14W–22L · 46.8% of games
3.5
23.9%
11W–35L · 37.3% of games
5.5
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
6.5
11.1%
1W–8L · 35.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 34% of the time
#2 Doubles
34%
43 matches
#1 Doubles
32%
40 matches
#3 Doubles
32%
40 matches
#1 Singles
2%
2 matches
#3 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to take the initiative and play your game. Confidence is just believing you can do it.
Chris Evert