← Search

Kim Cabelka

Hillsborough, NC
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
182 matches · 89W–93L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Kim Cabelka to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history182 matches
L
2026-09-02 · JORegan.5.5C-HR · #1 Doubles · 5.5 · with Renu Mathias
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 5-7
W
Sonya Bentovich / Erin McMurtrey
2026-08-30 · ETurner.18C-HR · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Jesse Shoemaker-Ramsey
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-1, 1-0
W
2026-08-19 · JORegan.5.5C-HR · #1 Doubles · 5.5 · with Renu Mathias
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
L
2026-08-12 · CMurray-HR · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Kristy Clare
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
L
2026-08-11 · ETurner.18C-HR · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Barbie McGarrah
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
W
2026-08-09 · ETurner.18C-HR · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Barbie McGarrah
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-08-05 · CMurray-HR · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Michelle Koeneke
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
W
2026-07-29 · AHabib-HR · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with James Bowers mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 7-5
W
2026-06-24 · AHabib-HR · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with James Bowers mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-3
W
2026-06-18 · DScruggs-HR · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with James Bowers mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-1
W
2026-06-15 · KTravis-HR · #3 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
L
2026-06-10 · AHabib-HR · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with James Bowers mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 4-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams44 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.0
50.5%
51W–50L · 50.3% of games
3.5
38.9%
7W–11L · 44.3% of games
5.5
36.8%
7W–12L · 49.3% of games
6.5
37.5%
6W–10L · 43.5% of games
3.0mixed
65.4%
17W–9L · 55.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Singles, 26% of the time
#1 Singles
26%
47 matches
#2 Doubles
22%
40 matches
#1 Doubles
20%
37 matches
#2 Singles
15%
27 matches
#3 Doubles
12%
22 matches
#3 Singles
5%
9 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert