← Search

Julie Myers

— year-end
74 matches · 50W–24L · seasons 2025–2026

Captains: add Julie Myers to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history74 matches
L
2026-08-28 · HHutchins-CHCC · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Carla Sevilla
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-08-19 · KUpton.40C-CHCC · #1 Doubles · 5.5 · with Lauren Derrenbacher
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
W
2026-08-11 · KJeffs-CHCC · #3 Doubles · 5.5 · with Carrie Schreiber
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
W
2026-08-07 · HHutchins-CHCC · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Carla Sevilla
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-1, 1-0
W
2026-08-05 · KUpton.40C-CHCC · #1 Doubles · 5.5 · with Lily Huang
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
W
2026-07-19 · CWilliamson-CHCC · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jennifer Woods
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
W
2026-07-15 · KUpton.T-CHCC · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Joanna Hooten
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
W
2026-07-13 · KUpton.T-CHCC · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kimberly Jeffs
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-07-08 · KUpton.T-CHCC · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kimberly Jeffs
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-07-06 · JMyers-CHCC · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 7-5
W
2026-06-29 · JMyers-CHCC · #3 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
W
2026-06-28 · CWilliamson-CHCC · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Courtney Whilden
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
Teams33 teams · 2023–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
2.5
100%
7W–0L · 77.9% of games
3.0
62.9%
22W–13L · 57.3% of games
3.5
50%
8W–8L · 45.1% of games
5.5
85.7%
12W–2L · 69.3% of games
6.5
1W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 28% of the time
#3 Doubles
28%
21 matches
#1 Doubles
26%
19 matches
#2 Doubles
23%
17 matches
#1 Singles
12%
9 matches
#2 Singles
7%
5 matches
#3 Singles
4%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova