← Search

Jeff Griffis

DECATUR, AL
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
105 matches · 48W–57L · seasons 2023–2026

Captains: add Jeff Griffis to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history105 matches
W
2026-09-11 · Lamar 6.5 Combo 18 · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Zach Ingrum
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-0
L
2026-08-30 · Lamar 7.5 Combo 40M · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Gregory Edwards
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 7-5, 1-0
W
2026-08-29 · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Dan Lucas
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-08-24 · Lamar 7.5 Combo 40M · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Frank Roberts
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
L
2026-08-22 · Lamar 7.5 Combo 40M · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Patton Watson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 5-7
L
2026-08-18 · Lamar 6.5 Combo 18 · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with David Stisher
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
L
2026-08-15 · Lamar 7.5 Combo 40M · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Chuck Lamar
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 7-6, 0-1
L
2026-08-08 · Lamar 40-30 Tri 40 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Bryan Henderson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
L
2026-08-08 · Lamar 6.5 Combo 18 · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Joshua Zona
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
L
2026-08-02 · Lamar 6.5 Combo 18 · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with David Stisher
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 2-6
W
2026-08-01 · Lamar 40-30 Tri 40 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Joseph Marks
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
L
2026-07-30 · Capone 3.5 Mixed 18 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Debra Crowell mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 1-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams92 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
2.5
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
3.5
51%
25W–24L · 48% of games
4.0
37.5%
12W–20L · 45.5% of games
6.5
25%
1W–3L · 43.3% of games
7.5
14.3%
1W–6L · 36.6% of games
3.5mixed
42.9%
3W–4L · 49.2% of games
7.0mixed
100%
4W–0L · 58.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 34% of the time
#3 Doubles
34%
36 matches
#2 Doubles
33%
35 matches
#1 Doubles
30%
31 matches
#4 Doubles
3%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to take the initiative and play your game. Confidence is just believing you can do it.
Chris Evert