← Search

RAUNAQ BAJAJ

— year-end
51 matches · 25W–26L · seasons 2025–2026

Captains: add RAUNAQ BAJAJ to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history51 matches
W
2026-08-15 · Plankenhorn 7.5 Combo 40M · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Ray Palmer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-7, 1-0
W
2026-08-08 · Proctor 6.5 Combo 18 · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Jason Seale
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
L
2026-06-15 · Lamar 40 -30 Tri 18 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Josh Wisener
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-0, 0-1
W
2026-05-08 · Roth 2026 Spring 3.5 40+ · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
W
2026-05-04 · Roth 2026 Spring 3.5 40+ · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Hill Rowan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
L
2026-04-09 · Roth 2026 Spring 3.5 40+ · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Krishna Bathina
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 4-6
L
2026-04-06 · Roth 2026 Spring 3.5 40+ · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Rohith Kota
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 7-5, 0-1
W
2026-04-04 · Roth 2026 Spring 3.5 40+ · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Bernie Vatz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
L
2026-04-01 · Roth 2026 Spring 3.5 40+ · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Troy Firman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
L
Chris Smith / Troy Lindig
2026-03-26 · Roth 2026 Spring 3.5 40+ · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Eric Blum
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
L
2026-03-15 · Lamar 3.5 18 Spring · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Allen Hines
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 2-6
W
2026-03-10 · Haliczer 18+ 4.0 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Amir Hashemian
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
Teams31 teams · 2023–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.5
40.5%
15W–22L · 46.9% of games
4.0
40%
2W–3L · 39.6% of games
6.5
85.7%
6W–1L · 52.9% of games
7.5
2W–0L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 33% of the time
#3 Doubles
33%
17 matches
#1 Doubles
24%
12 matches
#2 Doubles
22%
11 matches
#4 Doubles
14%
7 matches
#1 Singles
8%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The mark of great sportsmen is not how good they are at their best, but how good they are at their worst.
Martina Navratilova