← Search

Jack Fuller

Buffalo, NY
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
235 matches · 81W–154L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Jack Fuller to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history235 matches
L
2026-08-01 · Challenger 6580 · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Gerard Owczarczak
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 2-6
W
2026-07-13 · Western: Knerr Legends · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Mark Goldsman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
L
2026-07-11 · Challenger 6580 · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Tom Chestnut
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
W
2026-06-29 · Western: Knerr Legends · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Howard Rich
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-1
L
2026-06-28 · #1 Doubles · with Sally Abell championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 5-7
L
2026-06-28 · #3 Doubles · with Paula Conti championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
L
2026-06-27 · #1 Doubles · with Sally Abell championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 0-6
W
2026-06-23 · Western: Knerr Legends · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Paul Yu
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-06-20 · Challenger 6580 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Vinnie Davis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 7-5, 0-1
L
2026-06-13 · Challenger 6580 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Gerard Owczarczak
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 0-6, 0-1
W
2026-06-10 · Fred's Team · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Michael Urban
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-2
W
2026-06-03 · Fred's Team · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Fredrick Hazzan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams45 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
0.0
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.5
34.4%
11W–21L · 43.3% of games
4.0
25%
4W–12L · 39.1% of games
4.5
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0
57.5%
23W–17L · 50.5% of games
8.0
19%
4W–17L · 36.3% of games
7.0mixed
44.8%
26W–32L · 46.4% of games
8.0mixed
9.3%
4W–39L · 31.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 46% of the time
#1 Doubles
46%
109 matches
#2 Doubles
32%
74 matches
#3 Doubles
22%
52 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.
Roger Federer