← Search

Sally Abell

Buffalo, NY
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
181 matches · 100W–81L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Sally Abell to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history181 matches
L
2026-07-28 · Stohl · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Cheryl Athoe
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 7-5, 0-1
W
2026-07-25 · #2 Doubles · with Alice Curtiss championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-07-14 · BUF: Smith/Benz · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lauren Stall
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
2026-07-09 · J-LO · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lisa Hoffman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 0-6
L
2026-07-06 · Doxtad · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kathryn Pasier
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 0-6
W
2026-06-30 · BUF: Smith/Benz · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lauren Stall
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-3
L
2026-06-29 · Doxtad · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Patricia Thielen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 5-7
L
2026-06-28 · #1 Doubles · with Jack Fuller championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 5-7
L
2026-06-27 · #1 Doubles · with Jack Fuller championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 0-6
L
2026-06-25 · J-LO · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Patricia Thielen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 7-5, 1-0
L
2026-06-22 · Stohl · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with April Zolczer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 3-6, 0-1
W
2026-06-18 · J-LO · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Patricia Thielen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-3, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams35 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.5
65.1%
41W–22L · 55.9% of games
4.0
40.7%
11W–16L · 44.6% of games
7.0
54.8%
17W–14L · 53.6% of games
8.0
41.7%
10W–14L · 44.8% of games
7.0mixed
73.3%
11W–4L · 58.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 53% of the time
#1 Doubles
53%
95 matches
#2 Doubles
24%
43 matches
#3 Doubles
23%
42 matches
#2 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer