← Search

Julie MacDonald

— year-end
382 matches · 163W–219L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Julie MacDonald to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history382 matches
L
2026-08-08 · #2 Doubles · with Karen Watts championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 4-6, 0-1
W
2026-08-07 · #1 Doubles · with Karen Watts championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-08-07 · #3 Doubles · with Karen Watts championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-06-19 · #3 Doubles · with Karen Watts championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
W
Christi Lin / Dawn Anderson
2026-06-17 · #3 Doubles · with Karen Watts championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-4
L
2026-06-15 · #1 Doubles · with Karen Watts championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 4-6
W
2026-05-16 · NV/Azous/18&OverW3.5 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Travis Azous
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-6
L
2026-05-13 · RED ROCK CC #1 · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Karrie Bennallack
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 5-7, 0-1
W
2026-05-06 · RED ROCK CC · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Adam Neubauer mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-1
W
2026-05-04 · RED ROCK CC #2 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Karin de Amicis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 0-6, 1-0
W
2026-05-03 · RED ROCK CC #1 · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Paul Hollander mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-2
W
2026-05-02 · NV/Azous/18&OverW3.5 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Karen Watts
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
Teams65 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.5
60%
9W–6L · 54.5% of games
4.0
39.6%
93W–142L · 45.9% of games
7.0
60.5%
23W–15L · 55% of games
7.0mixed
41.7%
20W–28L · 45.9% of games
7.5mixed
25%
7W–21L · 40.9% of games
8.0mixed
63.6%
7W–4L · 56.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 39% of the time
#3 Doubles
39%
147 matches
#2 Doubles
33%
125 matches
#1 Doubles
24%
90 matches
#4 Doubles
5%
20 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer