← Search

Hayley Hollander

LAS VEGAS, NV
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
303 matches · 190W–113L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Hayley Hollander to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history303 matches
L
2026-09-09 · RED ROCK CC · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Nicole Lefebvre
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
L
2026-08-25 · TPC #1 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kelly Elwart
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 2-6, 0-1
L
2026-07-29 · RED ROCK CC · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jacqueline Prestileo
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
L
2026-07-28 · TPC #1 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Travis Azous
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 5-7
L
2026-07-21 · TPC #1 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Candra Milohnic
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 7-5, 0-1
L
2026-07-15 · RED ROCK CC · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kelly Elwart
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
W
2026-06-20 · #2 Doubles · with Kelly Elwart championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
Sheri Grossberg / Heather George
2026-06-18 · #2 Doubles · with Shannan Ohlson championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-06-16 · #3 Doubles · with Candra Milohnic championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
W
2026-05-30 · RED ROCK CC #1 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kelly Elwart
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
W
2026-05-29 · #3 Doubles · with Scott Hopson championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
L
2026-05-28 · #3 Doubles · with Scott Hopson championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams45 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
3.0
48.1%
13W–14L · 54.4% of games
3.5
71.6%
83W–33L · 60.5% of games
4.0
58.5%
48W–34L · 51.6% of games
4.5
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
7.5
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
61.9%
13W–8L · 53.9% of games
7.5mixed
60.9%
14W–9L · 53.1% of games
8.0mixed
69.2%
9W–4L · 56.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 31% of the time
#2 Doubles
31%
94 matches
#1 Doubles
29%
89 matches
#3 Doubles
24%
72 matches
#4 Doubles
7%
21 matches
#1 Singles
6%
17 matches
#1 Female Doubles
1%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert