← Search

Daniel Angst

Boulder, CO
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
65 matches · 23W–42L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Daniel Angst to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history65 matches
L
Lars Malmstrom / Kevin Grant
2026-09-01 · BTA-IBM RED · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with James Esson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 1-6
L
2026-08-25 · BTA-IBM RED · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Suresh Namala
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
L
2026-07-28 · BTA-IBM RED · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Niels Damrauer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-07-14 · BTA-C NAVY · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Stephen Richter
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
L
2026-07-07 · BTA-C NAVY · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Reed Mayne
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-3, 0-1
L
2026-06-13 · #3 Doubles · with Stephen Richter championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
L
2026-06-09 · BTA-C NAVY · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Stephen Richter
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
L
2026-05-11 · BTA-C NAVY · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Reed Mayne
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
W
2026-04-28 · BTA-C NAVY · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Niels Damrauer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 4-6, 1-0
W
N/A
2026-04-21 · BTA-C NAVY · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Stuart Dimson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
L
2025-07-15 · BTA-F GREEN · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Niels Damrauer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
W
2025-07-03 · BTA-F GREEN · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Bill Dietz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams15 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
3.5
37.3%
22W–37L · 46.5% of games
7.0mixed
20%
1W–4L · 37.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 42% of the time
#1 Doubles
42%
27 matches
#2 Doubles
31%
20 matches
#3 Doubles
26%
17 matches
#1 Singles
2%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to take the initiative and play your game. Confidence is just believing you can do it.
Chris Evert