← Search

Cheryl Clausen

La Salle, CO
2.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
62 matches · 10W–52L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Cheryl Clausen to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history62 matches
L
Lisa Martin / Helen Migchelbrink
2026-08-07 · ETA RED · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Gail Sullivan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 0-6
L
2026-07-31 · ETA RED · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Koleen Schriever
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
L
2026-07-24 · ETA RED · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Carolyn Gattis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 1-6
L
2025-08-01 · ETA RED · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Gail Sullivan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
L
Marne Engelking / Karen Johnson
2025-07-25 · ETA RED · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Gail Sullivan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
L
2025-07-11 · ETA RED · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Alexina Campbell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 1-6
L
2025-06-13 · ETA BLUE · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Gail Sullivan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
L
2025-05-23 · ETA BLUE · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Koleen Schriever
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
L
2025-05-16 · ETA BLUE · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Carolyn Gattis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
L
2025-05-09 · ETA BLUE · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Carolyn Gattis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 3-6, 0-1
L
2024-07-05 · ETA RED · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Diane Holmberg
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 0-6
L
2024-07-01 · TAG PINK · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Amber Nichols
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 0-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams18 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
2.5
50%
8W–8L · 52.5% of games
3.0
3.3%
1W–29L · 29.9% of games
6.0
6.2%
1W–15L · 30.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 40% of the time
#2 Doubles
40%
25 matches
#3 Doubles
36%
22 matches
#1 Doubles
21%
13 matches
#1 Singles
3%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams