← Search

Marc Hawkins

— year-end
57 matches · 30W–27L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Marc Hawkins to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history57 matches
L
2026-03-28 · PHX/Grabel/55&O/7.0M · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with John Brauneis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 2-6
W
2026-03-21 · PHX/Grabel/55&O/7.0M · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Mark Conklin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-1
L
2026-02-23 · 3.5 PTC Fellowship M40S · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kimble van der Steen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 0-6, 0-1
L
2026-02-21 · PHX/Grabel/55&O/7.0M · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with John Brauneis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 4-6, 0-1
L
2026-02-09 · 3.5 PTC Fellowship M40S · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Mark Conklin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
W
2025-11-25 · 3.5 PTC Fellowship Grabel M40F · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kimble van der Steen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-2, 1-0
W
2025-11-17 · 3.5 PTC Fellowship Grabel M40F · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kimble van der Steen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-0
W
2024-04-01 · PHX/Grabel/40&O/3.5M · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with James Rees
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 4-6, 1-0
L
2024-03-31 · 7.0 PTC Kinney X18S · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Pamela Kinney mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 4-6
W
2024-03-18 · PHX/Grabel/40&O/3.5M · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with James Rees
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-6
L
2024-02-02 · 7.0 PTC Kinney X18S · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Tina Slater mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 4-6
W
2024-01-29 · PHX/Grabel/40&O/3.5M · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Mark Conklin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
Teams19 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.5
68.6%
24W–11L · 54.9% of games
4.0
44.4%
4W–5L · 44.4% of games
7.0
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
8.5
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
14.3%
1W–6L · 46% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 42% of the time
#2 Doubles
42%
24 matches
#3 Doubles
40%
23 matches
#1 Doubles
16%
9 matches
#2 Singles
2%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova