← Search

Kimble van der Steen

— year-end
304 matches · 194W–110L · seasons 2019–2027

Captains: add Kimble van der Steen to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history304 matches
W
2026-09-10 · 3.5 PTC2 HitandRun M18F · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Michael Narlock
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
W
2026-09-03 · 3.5 PTC2 HitandRun M18F · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Michael Narlock
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-08-27 · 3.5 PTC2 HitandRun M18F · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Michael Narlock
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-4
W
2026-04-09 · 3.5 PTC HitandRun M18S · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Michael Narlock
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-04-06 · 3.5 PTC Fellowship M40S · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with John Brauneis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-3
W
2026-04-04 · PHX/Grabel/55&O/7.0M · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Daniel Filby
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
W
2026-04-02 · 3.5 PTC HitandRun M18S · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Michael Narlock
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-0, 1-0
W
2026-03-29 · SPR 3.5 PTC Jaquess X40S · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Shannon Gleave mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 1-6, 1-0
W
2026-03-24 · 3.5 PTC HitandRun M18S · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jonah Soble
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-1
W
2026-03-23 · 3.5 PTC Fellowship M40S · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Rudy Dudebout
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
L
2026-03-22 · SPR 3.5 PTC Jaquess X40S · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Heather Stone mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 7-6, 1-0
L
2026-03-16 · 3.5 PTC Fellowship M40S · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Michael Burns
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 6-1, 1-0
Teams45 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.5
71.9%
120W–47L · 58.1% of games
4.0
25%
13W–39L · 42.5% of games
7.0
100%
5W–0L · 74.4% of games
3.5mixed
58.3%
7W–5L · 51.1% of games
7.0mixed
71.2%
47W–19L · 58.7% of games
8.0mixed
2W–0L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 36% of the time
#2 Doubles
36%
110 matches
#3 Doubles
29%
88 matches
#1 Doubles
26%
80 matches
#1 Singles
7%
20 matches
#2 Singles
2%
6 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams