← Search

Michelle Huffman

— year-end
150 matches · 57W–93L · seasons 2021–2026

Captains: add Michelle Huffman to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history150 matches
W
2026-09-10 · Sanders/CRCC/Foothills · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Megan Reid
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
W
2026-09-08 · Sanders/CRCC/Foothills · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Lydia Sanders
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
W
2026-09-07 · Sanders/CRCC/Foothills · #1 Doubles · 5.5 · with Jessie Moore
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-4
W
2026-09-01 · Sanders/CRCC/Foothills · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Lydia Sanders
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 7-6, 1-0
L
2026-08-29 · Moore-Kiser/HCP/Foothills · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Jennifer Dufour
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 0-6
L
Lisa Moore / Irelix Gonzalez
2026-08-27 · Sanders/CRCC/Foothills · #2 Doubles · 5.5 · with Lanie Bumgarner
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 4-6, 0-1
L
Amanda Cox / Jennifer Graham
2026-08-26 · Sanders/CRCC/Foothills · #1 Doubles · 5.5 · with Whitney Dominique
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 6-3, 0-1
L
2026-08-13 · Owens/PC/Foothills · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Susan Davis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 4-6
L
2026-08-13 · Sanders/CRCC/Foothills · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Megan Reid
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
Aleshia Abernathy / Julie Wilson
2026-08-12 · Sanders/CRCC/Foothills · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Susan Davis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
W
2026-08-11 · Sanders/CRCC/Foothills · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Amy Moore
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
L
Ashley Stahlschmidt / Jennifer Graham
2026-08-05 · Sanders/CRCC/Foothills · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Karen Isbell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
Teams43 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
0.0
47.4%
9W–10L · 46.8% of games
2.5
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.0
51.8%
29W–27L · 50.7% of games
3.5
18.2%
4W–18L · 37.7% of games
5.5
11.1%
1W–8L · 38.3% of games
6.5
31.4%
11W–24L · 43.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 54% of the time
#1 Doubles
54%
81 matches
#2 Doubles
35%
52 matches
#3 Doubles
11%
16 matches
#4 Doubles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams