← Search

Karen Isbell

Granite Falls, NC
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
212 matches · 102W–110L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Karen Isbell to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history212 matches
W
2026-09-10 · Sanders/CRCC/Foothills · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Joy Romano
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-4
L
2026-09-08 · Sanders/CRCC/Foothills · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Amy Moore
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
L
2026-09-01 · Sanders/CRCC/Foothills · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Amy Moore
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 2-6, 0-1
L
2026-08-27 · Sanders/CRCC/Foothills · #3 Doubles · 5.5 · with Kodi Hendrix
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 3-6
W
2026-08-27 · Sanders/CRCC/Foothills · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Amy Moore
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-4
W
2026-08-26 · Sanders/CRCC/Foothills · #2 Doubles · 5.5 · with Catherine Mccrary
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 5-7, 1-0
W
2026-08-20 · Sanders/CRCC/Foothills · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Amy Moore
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-08-19 · Sanders/CRCC/Foothills · #2 Doubles · 5.5 · with Whitney Dominique
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-08-18 · Sanders/CRCC/Foothills · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Lydia Sanders
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-4
L
2026-08-12 · Sanders/CRCC/Foothills · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Alicia Brown
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-3, 0-1
L
2026-08-11 · Sanders/CRCC/Foothills · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Joy Romano
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
L
2026-08-10 · #1 Doubles · 5.5 · with Sierra Caudle
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-3, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams44 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
0.0
61.5%
8W–5L · 52% of games
3.0
56.5%
65W–50L · 52.3% of games
3.5
8%
2W–23L · 33.1% of games
5.5
44.4%
8W–10L · 47% of games
6.5
46.7%
14W–16L · 50% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 40% of the time
#1 Doubles
40%
84 matches
#2 Doubles
34%
71 matches
#3 Doubles
18%
37 matches
#1 Singles
8%
16 matches
#2 Singles
1%
2 matches
#4 Doubles
1%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert