← Search

Brooke Browning

Knoxville, TN
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
48 matches · 42W–6L · seasons 2023–2026

Captains: add Brooke Browning to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history48 matches
W
2026-08-28 · Miller/Knoxville · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Karen Lorino
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
L
2026-07-17 · Clarke/Knoxville · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jason Brown mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 3-6, 0-1
W
2026-07-07 · Clarke/Knoxville · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jason Brown mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-06-26 · Clarke/Knoxville · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jerry Witherspoon mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-1
W
2026-05-16 · Browning/Knoxville · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Santana Ewers
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-05-03 · Miller/Knoxille · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Wendy Petty
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
L
2026-04-18 · Browning/Knoxville · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Christina Kaak
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 7-6, 1-0
W
2026-03-28 · Browning/Knoxville · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Barbara Miller
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
W
2026-02-15 · BrowningDabbs/Knoxville · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kris Gompert
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-1, 1-0
W
2026-02-15 · BrowningDabbs/Knoxville · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Janene Nordin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-4
W
2026-02-07 · BrowningDabbs/Knoxville · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Leigh Henderson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-01-17 · BrowningDabbs/Knoxville · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Tara Hurley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams39 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
4.0
85.7%
30W–5L · 63.9% of games
8.5
100%
4W–0L · 66.2% of games
4.0mixed
88.9%
8W–1L · 68.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 54% of the time
#2 Doubles
54%
26 matches
#1 Doubles
25%
12 matches
#3 Doubles
19%
9 matches
#4 Doubles
2%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer