← Search

Deanna Unger

Knoxville, TN
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
55 matches · 45W–10L · seasons 2024–2026

Captains: add Deanna Unger to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history55 matches
L
Kristie Danby / Lynn Johnson
2026-08-28 · Miller/Knoxville · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Amanda Wilson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-7
W
Christina Johnson / Julie Harano
2026-08-24 · Perkey/Knoxville · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Cindi Mooney
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-2
W
2026-08-16 · Perkey/Knoxville · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Sharon Clark
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
W
2026-07-22 · Ambrose/Knoxville · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Baylor Anders mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-2
W
Tabitha McElrath / James Montgomery
2026-07-21 · Ambrose/Knoxville · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Alexander Osborne mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-4
W
Jason Brown / Brooke Browning
2026-07-17 · Gosselin 40s/Knoxville · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Daniel Unger mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-07-11 · Ambrose/Knoxville · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Daniel Unger mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 4-6, 1-0
W
James Montgomery / Tabitha McElrath
2026-07-10 · Ambrose/Knoxville · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Quinn Epperly mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-2
L
Laura Wolfe / Jason Brown
2026-07-08 · Ambrose/Knoxville · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Daniel Unger mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 4-6, 0-1
L
Jason Brown / Brooke Browning
2026-07-07 · Gosselin 40s/Knoxville · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Daniel Unger mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 4-6, 0-1
W
2026-05-17 · Miller/Knoxille · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-4
W
2026-05-16 · Browning/Knoxville · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams48 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
4.0
79.3%
23W–6L · 62.6% of games
7.5
100%
9W–0L · 67.1% of games
8.5
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
4.0mixed
81.2%
13W–3L · 57.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 35% of the time
#2 Doubles
35%
19 matches
#1 Doubles
29%
16 matches
#3 Doubles
27%
15 matches
#1 Singles
7%
4 matches
#2 Singles
2%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Losing is not my enemy. Fear of losing is my enemy.
Rafael Nadal