← Search

Joanne Reiling

Centerville, OH
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
48 matches · 21W–27L · seasons 2019–2025

Captains: add Joanne Reiling to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history48 matches
W
2025-05-06 · QRRC Hayes · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Michelle Lewis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
L
2025-04-08 · QRRC Hayes · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Melissa Conrad
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 5-1, 0-1
L
2025-03-11 · QRRC Hayes · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Laura Songer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 0-6
W
2025-02-25 · QRRC Hayes · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Ailing Weng
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
2024-11-05 · QRRC Linhardt · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Phyllis Adams
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 3-2
L
2024-10-08 · QRRC Linhardt · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Michelle Lewis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
L
2024-09-10 · QRRC Linhardt · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Michelle Lewis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 4-6, 0-1
L
2024-01-22 · KTC-Stout · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lisa Sauer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
L
2023-12-04 · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Phyllis Adams
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
L
2023-11-27 · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Phyllis Adams
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 1-6
W
2023-10-03 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Ailing Weng
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 2-5, 1-0
W
2023-09-19 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Ailing Weng
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams9 teams · 2023–2025
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.0
45%
9W–11L · 51.5% of games
3.5
21.4%
3W–11L · 31.1% of games
6.0
75%
3W–1L · 59.7% of games
7.0
60%
6W–4L · 57.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 31% of the time
#2 Doubles
31%
15 matches
#1 Doubles
27%
13 matches
#3 Doubles
23%
11 matches
#1 Singles
10%
5 matches
#4 Doubles
6%
3 matches
#2 Singles
2%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams