← Search

Phyllis Adams

— year-end
177 matches · 56W–121L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Phyllis Adams to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history177 matches
W
2026-07-12 · KTC-Henne · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Julie Matthews
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-0
L
2026-06-27 · KTC-Henne · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Julie Matthews
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 4-6
W
2026-06-06 · KTC-Henne · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Virginia Dowse
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-6
L
2026-05-30 · KTC-Henne · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Julie Matthews
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 7-6, 0-1
L
Lisa Sauer / Sarah Richards
2026-05-23 · KTC-Henne · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Virginia Dowse
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
L
2026-05-12 · QRRC-Hayes · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kamna Gupta
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 5-6
W
2026-04-18 · QRRC-Hudson · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Sharon Vance
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 7-5
L
Teresa Siefke / Jessica Franklin
2026-03-31 · QRRC-Hayes · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Melissa Conrad
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
L
2026-03-29 · SRTC-Henne · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Eric Lute mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 4-6, 0-1
L
2026-03-08 · SRTC-Henne · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Douglas Coy mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 2-6
L
2026-03-03 · QRRC-Hayes · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Melissa Conrad
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
W
2026-03-01 · QRRC-Hudson · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Sharon Vance
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-4
Teams48 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
3.0
46.9%
45W–51L · 46.9% of games
3.5
5.6%
2W–34L · 28.4% of games
5.5
25%
1W–3L · 48.1% of games
6.0
38.9%
7W–11L · 45.9% of games
6.5
0%
0W–11L · 32.1% of games
7.0
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
9.1%
1W–10L · 34.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 38% of the time
#2 Doubles
38%
67 matches
#3 Doubles
32%
57 matches
#1 Doubles
24%
42 matches
#4 Doubles
6%
11 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams