← Search

Heidi Weaver

Granbury, TX
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
71 matches · 29W–42L · seasons 2022–2027

Captains: add Heidi Weaver to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history71 matches
L
2026-09-12 · PPL WEAVER · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Madison Rutledge
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 4-6
W
2026-09-11 · PPL GREGORY · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Eva Gregory
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-1
L
2026-07-25 · TCU WEAVER · #3 Doubles · 0.0 · with Eva Gregory
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 4-6, 0-1
W
2026-07-18 · TCU WEAVER · #3 Doubles · 0.0 · with Kisa Kearney
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-3
W
2026-06-17 · TCU WEAVER · #2 Doubles · 0.0 · with Eva Gregory
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 5-7, 1-0
W
2026-06-13 · TCU WEAVER · #2 Doubles · 0.0 · with Lori Clark
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 7-6
L
2026-05-31 · Moore · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Eva Gregory
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
W
2026-05-30 · TCU WEAVER · #3 Doubles · 0.0 · with Melinda Whitlock
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
L
2026-05-24 · Weaver · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Courtney Morawski
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-05-24 · Moore · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Eva Gregory
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-3, 0-1
L
2026-05-23 · Weaver · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Susan May
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 1-6
W
2026-05-22 · Weaver · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Deanna Sullivan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 5-7, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams65 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
0.0
63.6%
7W–4L · 56.4% of games
2.5
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.0
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.5
48.6%
17W–18L · 50.6% of games
4.0
12.5%
1W–7L · 41.1% of games
6.5
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
7.5
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
30%
3W–7L · 42.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 30% of the time
#3 Doubles
30%
21 matches
#2 Doubles
27%
19 matches
#1 Doubles
23%
16 matches
#1 Singles
21%
15 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams