← Search

Teresa Albus

— year-end
64 matches · 36W–28L · seasons 2021–2027

Captains: add Teresa Albus to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history64 matches
W
2026-09-13 · Team 1 Kiest/Campbell W4.5S · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Kimberly Grogan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 7-5
W
2026-09-11 · HTC TAYLOR/SINGLETON · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Bree Young
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 7-6
L
2026-08-22 · Team 8 Gilda Tebeaux/Teresa Albus 8.5W · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Lori Mcwhorter
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
W
2026-06-12 · Kiest/Albus W4.0T · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Holly Friedman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-05-28 · Kiest/Albus W4.0T · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lori Mcwhorter
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-0
L
2026-05-24 · Albus/Tebeaux · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Sarah Davis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
W
2026-05-24 · Albus/Tebeaux · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Sherrie Panter
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-05-23 · Albus/Tebeaux · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Melissa Greenhill
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 4-6
L
2026-05-22 · Albus/Tebeaux · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Sherrie Panter
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 5-7
W
Jennifer Hill / Lisa Johnson
2026-05-16 · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Kimberly Grogan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-6
W
2026-05-14 · Kiest/Albus W4.0T · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Bree Young
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-0
L
2026-05-13 · Kiest/Albus W4.0T · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kimberly Grogan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 3-6
Teams80 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level9 levels played
2.5
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
3.0
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
3.5
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
4.0
71.9%
23W–9L · 62.2% of games
4.5
25%
2W–6L · 39.6% of games
7.5
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
8.0
57.1%
4W–3L · 54.3% of games
8.5
14.3%
1W–6L · 35% of games
9.0
0W–3L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 47% of the time
#3 Doubles
47%
30 matches
#2 Doubles
31%
20 matches
#1 Doubles
20%
13 matches
#4 Doubles
2%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to take the initiative and play your game. Confidence is just believing you can do it.
Chris Evert