← Search

Melissa Sanders

— year-end
112 matches · 64W–48L · seasons 2021–2026

Captains: add Melissa Sanders to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history112 matches
W
2026-09-02 · High Tri W IRCD Pruitt · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Stephanie Stewart
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
L
2026-08-05 · High Tri W IRCD Pruitt · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Stephanie Stewart
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 0-6
W
2026-07-13 · Indy A18 4.5W RRRC Taylor · #1 Singles · 4.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
W
Sarah Brown / Anne Sharp
2026-06-29 · Indy A18 4.5W RRRC Taylor · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Brenda Harper
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
L
Meghan Slaninka
2026-06-20 · Indy A18 4.5W RRRC Taylor · #1 Singles · 4.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 5-7
W
Kourtney Cogdill / Catherine Miller
2026-06-15 · Indy A18 4.5W RRRC Taylor · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Brenda Harper
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-1
W
2026-06-08 · Indy A18 4.5W RRRC Taylor · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Brenda Harper
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-7, 1-0
W
2026-02-21 · Indy A18 4.5W IHP Deiters · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Yamana Uno
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
L
2026-01-18 · Indy A18 4.5W IHP Deiters · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Margot Burke
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
L
2025-08-13 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Margot Burke
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
L
2025-07-25 · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Michael Heinekamp mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 6-3, 0-1
W
2025-07-07 · #1 Singles · 4.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-3
Teams8 teams · 2023–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
2.5
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
3.5
75%
3W–1L · 55.1% of games
4.0
84.6%
11W–2L · 66% of games
4.5
72.1%
31W–12L · 56.6% of games
8.5
24%
6W–19L · 40.2% of games
8.0mixed
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
8.5mixed
75%
3W–1L · 58.8% of games
9.0mixed
38.9%
7W–11L · 47.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 38% of the time
#1 Doubles
38%
43 matches
#2 Doubles
29%
32 matches
#1 Singles
25%
28 matches
#3 Doubles
8%
9 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams