← Search

Emily Wandel

Indianapolis, IN
4.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
310 matches · 217W–93L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Emily Wandel to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history310 matches
W
2026-07-22 · Indy A40 4.5W PATC Squires · #1 Singles · 4.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
L
2026-07-15 · Indy A40 4.5W PATC Squires · #1 Singles · 4.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 1-3, 0-1
L
2026-07-13 · Indy A18 4.5W PATC Squires · #1 Singles · 4.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
L
2026-07-08 · Indy A40 4.5W PATC Squires · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Susan Winter
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
W
2026-07-01 · Indy A40 4.5W PATC Squires · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Katelyn Hale Riley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-06-27 · Indy A40 4.5W PATC Squires · #1 Singles · 4.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-5
L
2026-06-08 · Indy A18 4.5W PATC Squires · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Riley Wheatley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
W
Michelle Hill
2026-06-03 · Indy A40 4.5W PATC Squires · #1 Singles · 4.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-1
W
2026-05-17 · Indy 8.5W PATC Squires · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Sofia Soltis
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-2
W
Annie Chechitelli / Jennifer Barnes
2026-05-11 · Indy A18 4.5W PATC Squires · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with ANN KEATON
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
W
2026-05-03 · Indy 8.5W PATC Squires · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with ANN KEATON
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 4-2
W
Zoy Brown / Lisa Martin
2026-03-22 · Indy 8.5W PATC Squires · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with ANN KEATON
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 5-3
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams18 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level12 levels played
2.5
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
3.5
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
4.0
95.8%
46W–2L · 76.6% of games
4.5
62.8%
59W–35L · 56.6% of games
6.5
100%
12W–0L · 75.8% of games
7.5
85.7%
18W–3L · 67.3% of games
8.5
57.6%
19W–14L · 56.9% of games
10.0mixed
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
66.7%
6W–3L · 62.4% of games
8.0mixed
68.6%
24W–11L · 54.4% of games
8.5mixed
63.2%
12W–7L · 55.4% of games
9.0mixed
50%
14W–14L · 48.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 34% of the time
#1 Doubles
34%
105 matches
#1 Singles
27%
85 matches
#2 Doubles
25%
78 matches
#3 Doubles
12%
36 matches
#2 Singles
2%
6 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You can get through anything if you keep going one point at a time.
Arthur Ashe