← Search

Janet Poague

Pittsburgh, PA
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
43 matches · 21W–22L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Janet Poague to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history43 matches
L
2026-08-02 · Netchix · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jil Tauch
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 5-4, 0-1
W
2026-07-11 · Netchix · #4 Doubles · 3.0 · with Carol Small
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-0
L
2026-06-27 · Netchix · #4 Doubles · 3.0 · with Beverly Pietrandrea
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-2, 0-1
W
2026-05-03 · Netchix · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Beverly Pietrandrea
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-0, 1-0
L
Jamie Cygnarowicz / Carlee Vargo
2025-08-10 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Emily Chen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 2-6, 0-1
L
2025-08-08 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Patricia Dudek
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 3-6, 0-1
L
2025-08-03 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jane MacArtney
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-3, 0-1
L
Ruth Rush / Michelle Smith
2025-07-12 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Karen Goetz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-3, 0-1
W
2025-03-16 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Tim Lloyd mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 7-5
W
2025-02-22 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Tim Lloyd mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-4
W
2025-01-26 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Tim Lloyd mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-4
W
2025-01-18 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Tim Lloyd mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-3
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams3 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.0
25%
2W–6L · 52.1% of games
6.0mixed
87.5%
7W–1L · 61.6% of games
6.5mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
48%
12W–13L · 47.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 37% of the time
#1 Doubles
37%
16 matches
#3 Doubles
30%
13 matches
#2 Doubles
28%
12 matches
#4 Doubles
5%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The mark of great sportsmen is not how good they are at their best, but how good they are at their worst.
Martina Navratilova