← Search

Janet Klesic

Pittsburgh, PA
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
83 matches · 36W–47L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Janet Klesic to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history83 matches
L
2026-08-07 · Brady's Ladies · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jane MacArtney
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 0-6
L
2026-07-30 · Brady's Ladies · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Maripat Rafferty
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
W
2026-07-26 · PTA Dream Team · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Donna Courtney
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-07-19 · PTA Dream Team · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kristine Santerini
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 0-6
W
2026-06-28 · PTA Dream Team · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kathy Daschbach
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-0
W
2026-06-27 · Simply Smashing · #4 Doubles · 3.0 · with Paula Brethauer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 2-6, 1-0
L
2026-06-27 · Kick'in Aces · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jackie Slean
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-7
W
2026-06-07 · PTA Dream Team · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Joanna Fisher
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
W
2026-05-31 · Simply Smashing · #4 Doubles · 3.0 · with Sandra Jenkins
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
L
2026-04-26 · Kick'in Aces · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Susan Callahan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 3-6
L
2025-08-03 · #4 Doubles · 3.0 · with Dara Flaherty
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 1-6
W
2025-07-27 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Megan Schink
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams5 teams · 2023–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.0
72.2%
26W–10L · 56.8% of games
3.5
7.7%
1W–12L · 39.3% of games
6.0
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
7.0
12.5%
1W–7L · 32.4% of games
6.0mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
22.7%
5W–17L · 39.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 40% of the time
#3 Doubles
40%
33 matches
#2 Doubles
28%
23 matches
#4 Doubles
22%
18 matches
#1 Doubles
10%
8 matches
#1 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams