← Search

Glicelda Bradford

Louisville, KY
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
54 matches · 28W–26L · seasons 2023–2026

Captains: add Glicelda Bradford to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history54 matches
W
2026-05-23 · KY/LOU/BRADFORD · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Linda Ozier
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-1
W
2026-05-03 · KY/LOU/BRADFORD · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sarah Keith
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-7, 1-0
W
2026-04-26 · KY/LOU/BRADFORD · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sarah Keith
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
W
2026-03-21 · KY/LOU/BRADFORD · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Linda Ozier
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
L
Amy Clark / Elizabeth Bowling
2026-03-15 · KY/LOU/BRADFORD · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kristina Jordan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
W
2026-03-14 · KY/LOU/HALLER/SHIN · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Candace Rogers
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
L
2026-03-07 · KY/LOU/BRADFORD · #2 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-02-21 · KY/LOU/BRADFORD · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sara Robinson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
W
2026-02-15 · KY/LOU/BRADFORD · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Erica Rust
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-02-01 · KY/LOU/BRADFORD · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Erica Rust
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-1
L
2026-01-31 · KY/LOU/JORDAN/BRAY · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Valerie Nagel
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 1-6
W
2026-01-27 · KY/LOU/BRADFORD · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Rhonda Richardson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams30 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.5
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
4.0
52.3%
23W–21L · 51.5% of games
4.5
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.5
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
8.5
50%
2W–2L · 53.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 43% of the time
#3 Doubles
43%
23 matches
#2 Doubles
28%
15 matches
#1 Doubles
26%
14 matches
#2 Singles
2%
1 match
#4 Doubles
2%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.
Roger Federer