← Search

Jenny Baggs

Bono, AR
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
18 matches · 13W–5L · seasons 2024–2026

Captains: add Jenny Baggs to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history18 matches
W
2026-08-31 · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Catherine Frans
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-5
W
2026-04-13 · Inboden/JB/JCC · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Hailey Mitchener
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-1, 1-0
L
2026-04-06 · Inboden/JB/JCC · #2 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
W
Claire Mellin
2025-04-22 · Inboden/JB/3Oaks · #2 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2025-04-09 · TYSON/JB/JCC · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-7, 1-0
W
2025-04-06 · Inboden/JB/3Oaks · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Hailey Mitchener
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-0
W
2025-04-02 · TYSON/JB/JCC · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Hailey Mitchener
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
W
2025-03-19 · Inboden/JB/3Oaks · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kimberlee Tinsley Harrison
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
L
Claire Mellin
2024-05-22 · #2 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 1-6
L
Randilyne Huckaby / Amanda Heringer
2024-05-19 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Megan Ragsdale
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 1-6, 0-1
L
2024-05-14 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Hailey Mitchener
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 1-6, 0-1
W
2024-05-05 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Hailey Mitchener
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams19 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
4.0
70.6%
12W–5L · 54.3% of games
7.5
1W–0L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 39% of the time
#2 Doubles
39%
7 matches
#1 Singles
17%
3 matches
#2 Singles
17%
3 matches
#1 Doubles
11%
2 matches
#3 Doubles
11%
2 matches
#4 Doubles
6%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The mark of great sportsmen is not how good they are at their best, but how good they are at their worst.
Martina Navratilova