← Search

Andrea Seeman

Jonesboro, AR
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
36 matches · 16W–20L · seasons 2024–2026

Captains: add Andrea Seeman to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history36 matches
L
2026-06-29 · Cissell/JB/RPCC · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Mandy Folden
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 2-6, 0-1
L
2026-04-22 · Parker-Witherspoon/JB/RPCC · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Frances Anthony
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
W
Jamie Smith / Sarah Gifford
2026-04-19 · Parker-Witherspoon/JB/RPCC · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lori Tyson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-2
L
2026-04-13 · Cissell/JB/RPCC · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Bella Seeman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-04-06 · Cissell/JB/RPCC · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kaylee Berry
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
L
2026-03-31 · Parker/JB/3Oaks · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Susan Hart
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 7-6, 0-1
L
2025-10-28 · Cissell/JB/RPCC · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Shelley Cissell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 2-6
W
2025-10-08 · Cissell/JB/RPCC · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Shelley Cissell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
L
2025-09-17 · Cissell/JB/RPCC · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Carol Jones
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 5-7
L
2025-08-20 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Cherry Dallas
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 2-6, 0-1
L
2025-08-06 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Cherry Dallas
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
L
2025-07-16 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Leah Willett
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 3-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams26 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.5
55.6%
10W–8L · 52.8% of games
4.0
20%
2W–8L · 36.3% of games
7.5
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
3.5mixed
60%
3W–2L · 63.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 44% of the time
#2 Doubles
44%
16 matches
#3 Doubles
31%
11 matches
#1 Doubles
22%
8 matches
#4 Doubles
3%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Success is a journey, not a destination. The doing is often more important than the outcome.
Arthur Ashe