← Search

Linda Dest

— year-end
117 matches · 58W–59L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Linda Dest to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history117 matches
W
2026-07-11 · MIT:In It To Win It: Nava/Haven · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jeanne Consiglio
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-07-11 · MIT: Summer BB's:DeAngelis · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Susan Haven
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-6
W
2026-07-08 · MIT: Summer BB's:DeAngelis · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Mondel Teka
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-6
L
2026-06-28 · MIT:In It To Win It: Nava/Haven · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jeanne Consiglio
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 4-6
L
2026-06-23 · MIT: Summer BB's:DeAngelis · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Joyce Somers
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
L
2026-06-13 · MIT:In It To Win It: Nava/Haven · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Arla Wiles
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 2-6
L
2026-06-07 · MIT:In It To Win It: Nava/Haven · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Arla Wiles
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
L
2025-12-16 · MIT:Aceing Gracefully:DeAngelis · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Kirsten Page
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-2, 0-1
L
2025-12-12 · MIT:Aceing Gracefully:DeAngelis · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Milla Pospisil
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 2-6, 0-1
W
2025-12-05 · MIT:BB's Winter:DeAngelis · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kira Lent
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-4
L
2025-11-23 · MIT:BB's 40 :DeAngelis · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Nancy McDonough
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
W
2025-11-21 · MIT:BB's Winter:DeAngelis · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Susan Haven
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
Teams49 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
4.0
47.3%
26W–29L · 49.3% of games
7.0
64.7%
11W–6L · 52.5% of games
7.5
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
8.0
16.7%
2W–10L · 41.6% of games
7.0mixed
53.3%
8W–7L · 52.9% of games
8.0mixed
60%
9W–6L · 55.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 48% of the time
#2 Doubles
48%
56 matches
#3 Doubles
33%
38 matches
#1 Doubles
20%
23 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert