← Search

Jamie Behr

Norwalk, CT
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
270 matches · 165W–105L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Jamie Behr to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history270 matches
L
Christina Razook / Cristina Lievano
2026-07-14 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Helene Ginsburg
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-07-12 · KH:Age Advantage:Gaillard · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Denise Sousa
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
L
2026-06-25 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Gina Pacheco
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
W
2026-06-23 · KH: New Ads: Gaillard/Connelly · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kendal Gaillard
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
L
2026-06-22 · KH: New Ads: Gaillard/Connelly · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Liza Connolly
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 0-6
L
2026-06-18 · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 0-6, 0-1
L
2026-06-14 · KH: New Ads: Gaillard/Connelly · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Oona Robinson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 5-7
W
2026-06-13 · KH:Age Advantage:Gaillard · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Denise Sousa
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 3-3
W
2026-06-07 · KH:Age Advantage:Gaillard · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Mardi Durkin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-1
W
2026-05-31 · KH: New Ads: Gaillard/Connelly · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 3-4
L
Felicia DeSanto / Nanette Koryn
2026-05-21 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Pamela Fuehrer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
2026-05-20 · KH: New Ads: Gaillard/Connelly · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Liza Connolly
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 2-6, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams61 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.0
83.3%
35W–7L · 65.2% of games
3.5
68.8%
99W–45L · 56.6% of games
4.0
31.1%
19W–42L · 41.2% of games
7.5
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
8.0
80%
4W–1L · 59.1% of games
7.0mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Singles, 42% of the time
#1 Singles
42%
112 matches
#1 Doubles
24%
64 matches
#3 Doubles
19%
51 matches
#2 Doubles
13%
35 matches
#2 Singles
3%
8 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Start where you are. Use what you have. Do what you can.
Arthur Ashe