← Search

Beth Lapat

Newtown, PA
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
116 matches · 73W–43L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Beth Lapat to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history116 matches
L
2026-06-27 · Smart Aces · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kimberly Park
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 3-2, 0-1
L
2026-06-26 · Northampton Lobsters · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kathleen Jones
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
W
2026-06-19 · Northampton Lobsters · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kimberly Park
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 5-3
L
2026-06-12 · Northampton Lobsters · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Heather Livingston
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 4-6
L
2026-06-06 · Smart Aces · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kimberly Park
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 2-6
L
2026-05-16 · Smart Aces · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kimberly Park
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
L
2026-05-08 · Northampton Lobsters · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Heather Livingston
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
L
2026-05-01 · Northampton Lobsters · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kimberly Park
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 0-6
W
2026-04-17 · Northampton Lobsters · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Annette Dearolf
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
L
2026-03-04 · Wise Aces · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Wendy Kraus
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 0-3, 0-1
L
2026-02-25 · Wise Aces · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Heather Livingston
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 5-6
L
2026-02-16 · Wise Aces · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Heather Livingston
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams11 teams · 2023–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
3.5
78.1%
57W–16L · 59.8% of games
4.0
24.2%
8W–25L · 42.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 42% of the time
#1 Doubles
42%
49 matches
#2 Doubles
42%
49 matches
#3 Doubles
14%
16 matches
#4 Doubles
2%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I don’t want to be somebody else. I want to be myself and win in my way.
Rafael Nadal