← Search

Roxanna Choe

— year-end
236 matches · 135W–101L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Roxanna Choe to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history236 matches
L
2026-08-14 · #1 Singles championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
W
2026-07-11 · #1 Singles championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-06-27 · Pennsbury Peacocks · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 4-2
W
2026-06-26 · Snider · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Penni Sander
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
L
2026-06-25 · Split Steppers Night · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Christine Ferrara
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
L
2026-06-24 · Dangerous Divas · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Pamela Laufenberg
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 3-6, 0-1
W
2026-06-20 · Pennsbury Peacocks · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ann Tracey
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
L
2026-06-18 · Split Steppers Night · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Christine Ferrara
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-1, 0-1
W
2026-06-12 · Team Kuszelewicz · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Susanna Smit
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 7-5
L
2026-06-11 · Split Steppers Night · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jamie Wasserman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 1-3
W
N/A
2026-06-05 · Team Kuszelewicz · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Melinda Trang
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-06-04 · Split Steppers Night · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jamie Wasserman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-1
Teams30 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.0
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
3.5
90.9%
20W–2L · 68.9% of games
4.0
54.1%
93W–79L · 51.6% of games
8.0
80%
4W–1L · 62.5% of games
7.0mixed
72.7%
8W–3L · 49.1% of games
8.0mixed
0%
0W–5L · 38.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 28% of the time
#1 Doubles
28%
66 matches
#2 Doubles
25%
59 matches
#3 Doubles
22%
51 matches
#1 Singles
20%
46 matches
#4 Doubles
4%
9 matches
#2 Singles
2%
5 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You can get through anything if you keep going one point at a time.
Arthur Ashe